<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.0.2" -->
<rdf:RDF
	xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
>
<channel rdf:about="http://ecitonred.com/sh/blog/index.php">
	<title>Death to Writer's Block</title>
	<link>http://ecitonred.com/sh/blog/index.php</link>
	<description>Vulgarity intended to get me writing again.</description>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:date>2010-03-11T09:06:00</dc:date>
	<dc:creator>blog&#64;&#101;&#99;iton&#114;ed&#46;&#99;&#111;m</dc:creator>
	<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://wordpress.org/?v=1.0.2"/>
	<admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:bl&#111;g&#64;&#101;c&#105;t&#111;n&#114;ed.&#99;o&#109;"/>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<sy:updateBase>2000-01-01T12:00+00:00</sy:updateBase>
	<items>
		<rdf:Seq>
					<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ecitonred.com/sh/blog/index.php?p=904"/>
					<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ecitonred.com/sh/blog/index.php?p=903"/>
					<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ecitonred.com/sh/blog/index.php?p=902"/>
					<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ecitonred.com/sh/blog/index.php?p=900"/>
					<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ecitonred.com/sh/blog/index.php?p=899"/>
					<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ecitonred.com/sh/blog/index.php?p=898"/>
					<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ecitonred.com/sh/blog/index.php?p=897"/>
					<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ecitonred.com/sh/blog/index.php?p=896"/>
					<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ecitonred.com/sh/blog/index.php?p=895"/>
					<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ecitonred.com/sh/blog/index.php?p=894"/>
				</rdf:Seq>
	</items>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://ecitonred.com/sh/blog/index.php?p=904">
	<title>Destroy the world</title>
	<link>http://ecitonred.com/sh/blog/index.php?p=904</link>
	<dc:date>2009-06-25T01:59:54</dc:date>
	<dc:creator>sh (mailto:sh&#64;&#101;&#99;&#105;&#116;&#111;&#110;&#114;&#101;&#100;&#46;com)</dc:creator>
	
<dc:subject>General</dc:subject>	<description>The definitive difference between Creation and Destruction, is that destruction is very hard (often impossible) to undo.   </description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The definitive difference between Creation and Destruction, is that destruction is very hard (often impossible) to undo.
</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ecitonred.com/sh/blog/index.php?p=903">
	<title>Method For Specifying Time</title>
	<link>http://ecitonred.com/sh/blog/index.php?p=903</link>
	<dc:date>2009-02-14T05:01:15</dc:date>
	<dc:creator>sh (mailto:s&#104;&#64;ec&#105;t&#111;n&#114;&#101;&#100;.co&#109;)</dc:creator>
	
<dc:subject>General</dc:subject>	<description>
Invention?

User interface to specify time using a mouse.

Similar to the way that users are prompted with a calendar when they need to enter a date, users are presented a standard clock. Clicking on the location of the "little hand" sets the hour and approximates the minute. Then users can drag ...</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Invention?</p>
	<p>User interface to specify time using a mouse.</p>
	<p>Similar to the way that users are prompted with a calendar when they need to enter a date, users are presented a standard clock. Clicking on the location of the &#8220;little hand&#8221; sets the hour and approximates the minute. Then users can drag the minute hand for more accuracy.  </p>
	<p>You could use a 24 hour clock if AM pm can&#8217;t be guessed. Within &#8220;business hours&#8221; we know which are AM and PM.</p>
	<p>-sh</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ecitonred.com/sh/blog/index.php?p=902">
	<title>Corporatism</title>
	<link>http://ecitonred.com/sh/blog/index.php?p=902</link>
	<dc:date>2009-01-12T01:04:38</dc:date>
	<dc:creator>sh (mailto:sh&#64;e&#99;i&#116;&#111;&#110;r&#101;&#100;.c&#111;m)</dc:creator>
	
<dc:subject>General</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>I don't know</dc:subject>	<description>I think what we forget when we consider corporations, is that for some reason we think they are different from other earlier forms of human groups. We discuss their internal cultures like they are tribes, but we don't think about what happens when tribe expand into nations with governments. Corporations ...</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what we forget when we consider corporations, is that for some reason we think they are different from other earlier forms of human groups. We discuss their internal cultures like they are tribes, but we don&#8217;t think about what happens when tribe expand into nations with governments. Corporations are effectively localized dictatorships, and thus have the same efficiencies that dictatorships display, and the same weaknesses to corruption and perversion.  The American bargain has been to attempt to harness the efficiencies of totalitarianism within the workplace while separating out from our social lives. The problem is that of all regimes aimed at &#8220;efficiency&#8221; and &#8220;efficacy&#8221;; they always benefit (or at least think they benefit) from expanding their spheres. We have to think of corporations as limited governments, much the same way that the mafia is/was a competing government. Corporations have replaced the mafia, because some of the &#8220;organized&#8221; behaviors have become legal, and the organizations can profit more efficiently for &#8220;going straight&#8221; or twisting the rules so that straight is redefined. </p>
	<p>The problem we have fallen into is the statement that &#8220;there are a lot of things that the private sector can do more efficiently&#8221; without asking ourselves, &#8220;Why can they do it more efficiently?&#8221; It has become fairly common to ask or at least imply the question &#8220;When can they do it more efficiently?&#8221; But if we don&#8217;t address the source of that efficiency we cannot predict before we sell a contract.</p>
	<p>Notes: The main difference between a nation and a corporation is HR. Corps can choose who they hire to a greater degree than most Nations, but not much. If we look at full blown dictatorships, they can &#8220;fire&#8221; unproductive or uncooperative &#8220;employees&#8221;. They can recruit immigrants. They suffer from competition with other countries, so their biggest constraint is often public opinion and the willingness of the best workers to join them. If we look at the failed dictatorships, you will find that they lose more of their skilled workforce than they can recruit. The ones that haven&#8217;t failed, we don&#8217;t think of much, because they maintain a positive outward appearance. Those dictatorships can recruit enough skilled labor, because they pay them. </p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ecitonred.com/sh/blog/index.php?p=900">
	<title>Four axis political spectrum</title>
	<link>http://ecitonred.com/sh/blog/index.php?p=900</link>
	<dc:date>2008-12-13T20:14:30</dc:date>
	<dc:creator>sh (mailto:s&#104;&#64;eci&#116;&#111;&#110;&#114;ed&#46;c&#111;m)</dc:creator>
	
<dc:subject>General</dc:subject>	<description>So instead of a Right vs Left political spectrum which gets confused all the time, and where it isn't possible to tell the difference between ultra-left and ultra-right, because they both end up totalitarian dictatorships. [The Ultra takes precedent.] I suggest we start using a two axis spectrum that has ...</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So instead of a Right vs Left political spectrum which gets confused all the time, and where it isn&#8217;t possible to tell the difference between ultra-left and ultra-right, because they both end up totalitarian dictatorships. [The Ultra takes precedent.] I suggest we start using a two axis spectrum that has actual meaning, and not just historical reference.</p>
	<p>The Axis are:<br />
Individualism vs Communalism<br />
Anarchy vs Totalitarianism</p>
	<p>All &#8220;Ultra&#8221; governments tend toward totalitarianism.</p>
	<table style="text-align: center; width: 40%;" border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="2">
	<tbody>
	<tr>
	<td style="text-align: center;"></td>
	<td style="text-align: center;">Anarchy</td>
	<td style="text-align: center;"></td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
	<td style="text-align: center;">Communalism</td>
	<td style="text-align: center;">
      </td>
	<td style="text-align: center;">Individualism</td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
	<td style="text-align: center;"></td>
	<td style="text-align: center;">Totalitarianism</td>
	<td style="text-align: center;"></td>
	</tr>
	</tbody>
	</table>
	<p>Left would be Communalism and Right would be Individualism, in a sensible world, but you might notice that we don&#8217;t have that clear of a definition in practice.</p>
	<p>It&#8217;s probably important to note the difference between communalism and communism. Communism would be Communalist Totalitarian. </p>
	<p>Corporatism is actually the most interesting variant, because it is a group acting like an individual for the exclusion of other groups and actual individuals. So the groups are Communalist-Totalitarian internally, supporting Individualist-Anarchy externally.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ecitonred.com/sh/blog/index.php?p=899">
	<title>Why We Need National Leaders with Urban Backgrounds</title>
	<link>http://ecitonred.com/sh/blog/index.php?p=899</link>
	<dc:date>2008-11-21T18:00:30</dc:date>
	<dc:creator>sh (mailto:sh&#64;&#101;&#99;i&#116;o&#110;&#114;&#101;d.&#99;&#111;&#109;)</dc:creator>
	
<dc:subject>General</dc:subject>	<description>Most of the significant contemporary problems can be reduced to the problem of Scale. One piece of little will 

  </description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the significant contemporary problems can be reduced to the problem of Scale. One piece of little will </p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ecitonred.com/sh/blog/index.php?p=898">
	<title>Nihlism</title>
	<link>http://ecitonred.com/sh/blog/index.php?p=898</link>
	<dc:date>2008-10-22T13:28:21</dc:date>
	<dc:creator>sh (mailto:&#115;h&#64;e&#99;&#105;&#116;&#111;&#110;red&#46;com)</dc:creator>
	
<dc:subject>General</dc:subject>	<description>The strongest argument against Nihlism is that it is horribly depressing. Its greatest strength is that it argues that any refutation of itself can be successful based upon the merits of the refutation. Thus believing anything is better than believing nothing for the sake of our mental health. 

The problem ...</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The strongest argument against Nihlism is that it is horribly depressing. Its greatest strength is that it argues that any refutation of itself can be successful based upon the merits of the refutation. Thus believing anything is better than believing nothing for the sake of our mental health. </p>
	<p>The problem of course is that this preference for belief can be and has been perverted. Sociopaths who believe only in scoring points for themselves, have literally challenged themselves to find out how far they can push the beliefs of others. Societies problem is that it is very hard to discriminate between a believer and a con man.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ecitonred.com/sh/blog/index.php?p=897">
	<title>3 Million for Bear DNA</title>
	<link>http://ecitonred.com/sh/blog/index.php?p=897</link>
	<dc:date>2008-09-27T19:48:47</dc:date>
	<dc:creator>sh (mailto:&#115;h&#64;ec&#105;&#116;&#111;n&#114;ed.&#99;&#111;m)</dc:creator>
	
<dc:subject>General</dc:subject>	<description>Now, the question was, "How do you feel about $700 BILLION for the Wall St Bailout?" and McCain returns to his complaint about a $3million earmark to study bears. 

Now, If Congress is trying to decide upon how to progress with the Endangered Species Act, and they need more information ...</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, the question was, &#8220;How do you feel about $700 BILLION for the Wall St Bailout?&#8221; and McCain returns to his complaint about a $3million earmark to study bears. </p>
	<p>Now, If Congress is trying to decide upon how to progress with the Endangered Species Act, and they need more information to make those decisions, That is what earmarks ARE FOR. Congress wants an answer, so congress pays for it. </p>
	<p>Maybe they didn&#8217;t need to earmark $3million. Maybe $2million would have been enough. Maybe they really needed $4million in order to develop a comprehensive method of answering more than just bears. I don&#8217;t know. I can&#8217;t answer that question. What I can say is that if the question is $700 Billion and your only solution is $3million, you have a problem of scale.</p>
	<p>Let me put this into perspective that my brain can actually hold. Because million and Billion are kinda hard to keep straight.</p>
	<p>Imagine my fifteen-year-old son wants to buy a broken down Ford for $7,000, and I ask him, &#8220;Does it have an engine?&#8221; If his response to me is that I spent <strong> three cents</strong> discovering if my dinner chicken has food poisoning, he has a problem with scale.</p>
	<p>This is the scale we are talking about here. A seven-hundred-thousand difference between the question and McCain&#8217;s petulant answer.</p>
	<p>If McCain wants to micromanage the Senate Appropriations committee, then  he should stay in the Senate. His complain that he wasn&#8217;t able to actually succeed in controlling spending, when that was his job, is not a reason for us to give him a more important job that he can fail to do.
</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ecitonred.com/sh/blog/index.php?p=896">
	<title>Fundamentals are strong</title>
	<link>http://ecitonred.com/sh/blog/index.php?p=896</link>
	<dc:date>2008-09-25T17:23:41</dc:date>
	<dc:creator>sh (mailto:s&#104;&#64;&#101;c&#105;tonred.&#99;o&#109;)</dc:creator>
	
<dc:subject>General</dc:subject>	<description>McCains pitch was that the workers of America are our "Fundamentals" and those workers are committed and hardworking. The problem is that he supports policies that decrease the likelyhood of those workers having work. You can't tell me our fundamentals are strong because people are working more hours for less ...</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCains pitch was that the workers of America are our &#8220;Fundamentals&#8221; and those workers are committed and hardworking. The problem is that he supports policies that decrease the likelyhood of those workers having work. You can&#8217;t tell me our fundamentals are strong because people are working more hours for less pay. </p>
	<p>Yes, Americans are hard-working and they deserve better than to have their jobs shipped overseas.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ecitonred.com/sh/blog/index.php?p=895">
	<title>God's Dogs</title>
	<link>http://ecitonred.com/sh/blog/index.php?p=895</link>
	<dc:date>2008-09-13T14:19:12</dc:date>
	<dc:creator>sh (mailto:&#115;&#104;&#64;eci&#116;o&#110;&#114;&#101;d.&#99;&#111;m)</dc:creator>
	
<dc:subject>General</dc:subject>	<description>The bible says that God created us in his image. Why? What does that mean? If you argue that our allegiance to God (and to Good) is through Obedience. If we are only here to Obey, then we might as well be dogs.   </description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bible says that God created us in his image. Why? What does that mean? If you argue that our allegiance to God (and to Good) is through Obedience. If we are only here to Obey, then we might as well be dogs.
</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ecitonred.com/sh/blog/index.php?p=894">
	<title>Republicans? WTF?</title>
	<link>http://ecitonred.com/sh/blog/index.php?p=894</link>
	<dc:date>2008-09-03T21:40:16</dc:date>
	<dc:creator>sh (mailto:&#115;&#104;&#64;e&#99;i&#116;&#111;&#110;&#114;&#101;&#100;.c&#111;&#109;)</dc:creator>
	
<dc:subject>General</dc:subject>	<description>The speaker just spent 15min telling us that the government had to restrict our rights to protect our rights. 

Argh!  </description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The speaker just spent 15min telling us that the government had to restrict our rights to protect our rights. </p>
	<p>Argh!
</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>